Whirlpool sues contractor over allegations of pretend prospects and phony repairs


Whirlpool Canada is suing a B.C. contractor over what the equipment large claims are hundreds of invoices filed in affiliation with phony repairs supplied to prospects who don’t exist.

In keeping with a B.C. Supreme Courtroom discover of civil declare, Whirlpool paid greater than $4.6 million to firms managed by Mohinder Singh Sidhu and Kinder Kaur Sidhu to carry out six years price of guarantee companies for its B.C. Inside prospects.

However Whirlpool — which additionally manufactures and sells Maytag, Amana, Jenn-Air and KitchenAid residence home equipment — claims an audit revealed that a lot of these claims had been faux.

“The claims had been made for service and/or repairs in respect of shoppers that didn’t exist. The claims had been made for service and/or repairs for home equipment that don’t exist,” the lawsuit says.

“The claims had been made for service and/or repairs that weren’t supplied … the claims had been made for service and/or repairs on the premise of falsified buyer contact data.”

Audit reveals alleged fraud

The lawsuit, which was filed within the Vancouver registry, features a large binder stuffed with invoices allegedly supplied to Whirlpool from three firms, all allegedly owned and operated by the Surrey-based Sidhus.

Their firms — Inside Equipment Service Ltd., Inside Equipment Providers (2013) and Anderson’s Equipment Service (2009) — acted as impartial contractors for Whirlpool in Kelowna and Vernon.

In keeping with the lawsuit, an audit in February 2019 revealed that the contractors had been accepting cost for companies they did not render. ((Maytag/Related Press))

“(They) would supply guarantee service and repairs to Whirlpool prospects of their respective areas for Whirlpool merchandise, or merchandise beneath manufacturers owned by Whirlpool and would submit cost for these companies and repairs to Whirlpool,” the declare reads.

“Whirlpool would pay for companies rendered … and Whirlpool would reimburse Anderson, Inside and Inside 2013 for elements used within the provision of guarantee companies.”

Every service declare included particulars of the service or repairs, the date of the service, the mannequin and serial variety of the equipment, the price of elements and labour and the purchasers title, tackle, phone quantity and request.

In keeping with the declare, the contractors filed 29,323 service claims.

Whirlpool paid $2.7 million to the three firms for labour and greater than $1.8 million to its elements distributor, “which then despatched the related elements to Anderson and Inside.”

However the firm says an audit carried out in February 2019 revealed that the contractors had been accepting cost for companies they did not render and falsifying data within the claims.

Dwelling transferred for $1

The lawsuit says the Sidhus have stopped processing new claims for Whirlpool.

The quantity of the alleged fraud just isn’t specified, however Whirlpool claims that the couple has transferred possession of its Surrey residence due to the “claims in opposition to them in respect of the fraudulent claims.”

In keeping with a discover of civil declare, Mohinder Singh Sidhu and Kinder Kaur Sidhu transferred joint possession of this home to single possession for $1.

In keeping with the discover of civil declare, they transferred their Surrey residence from joint possession into Kinder Kaur Sidhu’s title in March 2019.

“The consideration for the switch listed on the property switch type is $1,” the lawsuit reads.

“The market worth of the property listed on the property switch type is $1,815,000.”

Whirlpool is suing the couple and their firms for fraud, breach of contract and unjust enrichment.

Nobody responded to a message left with the service firm and no response has been filed to the lawsuit.

Not one of the claims have been confirmed in court docket.


Supply hyperlink